Saturday, July 7, 2012

New Petition at

We petition the Obama administration to investigate misuse of Psychotronic (mind control) weapons.

   Victims of Psychotronic (Mind Control) Weapons are being targeted unjustly or used as human subjects in non-consensual experiments. Criminals may implant people with microchips or nanomaterials, monitor their brain, alter consciousness and behavior, torture mind and bodies. Victims may experience torture by microwave hearing, visual hallucinations, manipulation of thoughts, will and emotions, forced speech, involuntary body movements, transmission of specific commands into the subconscious and compulsory execution of them. Some targeted individuals are subject to harassment and organized stalking in their communities, some victims receive false psychiatric diagnoses. The misuse of such brain and body manipulation technologies directly undermines the Constitution and Criminal law of the USA

Thursday, October 13, 2011

We the People Petition

Sign this petition to end mind control abuse: With 4000+ more signatures by October 26th this issue will be brought to the Obama administration for official review!

We petition the Obama administration to form a presidential commission to investigate the covert use of mind control technologies on American citizens.

   The Church Committee's investigation of the FBI, NSA, and CIA in the early 1970s uncovered the existence of the CIA's secret mind control program, MKULTRA. This program non-consensually co-opted men, women, and children into experiments to access and control the human mind. Although officially shut down, in actuality mind control research programs are secretly thriving today among the US military and intelligence agencies. After several decades, these covert programs have achieved a high degree of success at the expense of the lives and livelihoods of many thousands of citizens whose complaints of stalking and intrusions have so far gone unheeded. The complete dissolution of our rights to privacy and other civil liberties as citizens and human beings is imminently at risk.

Saturday, April 30, 2011


The NRO's 2008 Review and Redaction Guide shows the limited information that can be released about the NRO's MASINT activities:

1. Fact that NRO systems perform MASINT collection.
2. Fact that U.S./NRO systems perform overhead measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT) collection.
3. General information surrounding the fact that the NRO is associated with MASINT in an R&D connotation.

1. All information about R&D, operational and nonoperational NRO MASINT collection and processing, with only a few exceptions, as indicated [above]. Information to be redacted includes system descriptions, technology, capabilities and operations, program names and numbers, dates, contractors, funding, facility locations, and satellite vulnerabilities, including susceptibility to denial, deception, and countermeasures.

DoD directive 5105.58 declares the National MASINT Management Office (NMMO), a joint organization subordinate to the director of the DIA, as managing the US MASINT System (USMS), a system-of-systems which provides the framework for tasking, collection, processing, exploitation and dissemination of MASINT. The NRO and DIA are considered mission partners in this regard where the NRO's responsibility is to "research, develop, acquire, launch, and maintain the operational capability of national space-based MASINT collection systems" including the "command and control of platforms and other systems required to enable space-based MASINT intelligence collection, processing, and dissemination." The NRO is "jointly staffed by members of the armed services, the Central Intelligence Agency, and DoD civilian personnel."

This leads me to believe that the NRO is on equal footing with the DIA as a suspect in the US government's remote neural monitoring activities.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

FBI Tip Line

I submitted this tip to the FBI last week and have yet to receive a phone call, email or personal visit. Maybe it's because I defined the constellation as LEO without including the possibility of MEO. Or maybe it's much simpler than that. Maybe they are an accomplice.
I would like to emphasize this information as a suspected tip. In 2006 an organization within the US government began openly communicating with me through remote sensing technology. These communications have taken the form of psychic driving, clicks and high frequency ringing, to name a few. My experience is consistent with brainwashing techniques developed by the CIA during project MKULTRA.

My personal investigation into the matter has identified the DIA as the prime suspect with possible cooperation from the CIA, NSA and NRO. The sensors are MASINT and possibly ELINT and operate from a low Earth orbit satellite constellation for realtime global coverage. These sensors can monitor and trigger a target's brain states including the transmission of auditory and visual messages directly to the mind.

The ground stations and processing facilities could be at any of several secure locations in the United States or other UKUSA state with the most sensitive being in a silo type environment underground. The computers are advanced enough to decode and respond to the thoughts of a multitude of targets without any perceptible delay.

What are my rights in this matter? Will it be investigated? Can the culprits be prosecuted? This is of utmost urgency as many people are suffering from the misuse of this technology.

My blog has more information and I invite you to study it:

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Space Preservation Act

The Space Preservation Act sponsored by representative Dennis Kucinich calls for a ban on the weaponization of space. This is an extension of the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 which bans the stationing of weapons of mass destruction in space. Its first introduction on October 2, 2001 included an extensive list of what could be called exotic weapons--psychotronics, chemtrails, weather modification, tectonic weapons, and others. On April 19, 2002 an unfavorable executive comment was received from the DoD pertaining to this bill. According to Doug Gordon, Kucinich’s spokesman, “[mind control] was not the concentration of the legislation, which is why it was tightened up and redrafted”. The bill was reintroduced on January 23, 2002 with exotic weapons presumably being redefined as 'undeveloped means'. Both bills died in committee. The redraft with some further edits was introduced in both the 108th and 109th Congresses only to again die in committee. As of now the bill has not been introduced in any subsequent Congress. The bill is summarized on Mr. Kucinich's website where peculiarly the 2001 version is not mentioned.

The most relevant line pertaining to space-based mind control was omitted in later versions of the bill:
The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:...(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)...(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations
Assuming this definition was redefined as an 'undeveloped mean' in later versions, would a space-based mind control weapon developed in secrecy still apply? And would the damage now have to be strictly physical instead of psychological considering the physical nature of the other redrafted definitions?

The purview of the bill also excludes putting a ban on any surveillance, reconnaissance or remote sensing activities that are not related to space-based weapons or systems. As clarification of this point Mr. Kucinich's website says "The use of space-based reconnaissance and intelligence equipment would be permitted". Does this mean a space-based system which facilitates telepathy is not a weapon? Or is it only considered a weapon when it is used for mind control. And what about the privacy of thought? Are we entitled to having our thoughts private or are they open for capture from space-based systems?

In my view there should be legislation banning these systems. It's the safe thing to do. For those affected it would grant rights and for the disbelievers it should not matter, it's not real, right?

Space Preservation Act of 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005

House Session 2974, Stop the Weaponization of Space, (5/19/05):

House Session 2991, H.AMDT.326 to H.R.2863 An amendment to add a new section entitled "Space Preservation Act of 2005", (6/20/05)

Saturday, January 15, 2011

John Akwei v. NSA

Those researching electronic harassment will no doubt come across the case of John Akwei v. NSA. Mr. Akwei alleges the NSA used it resources, including remote physiological devices, to illegally harass and surveil him for over a decade. Mr. Akwei brought his case before the US District Court in Washington DC in 1992 only to have it dismissed due to the Court being unable to identify any legal cause of action. In 1996 Nexus Magazine published Mr. Akwei's evidence dossier which he compiled after the ruling. The dossier has been republished on several websites sometimes with the spurious claim that Mr. Akwei is a former NSA employee. Other sites have taken the liberty of adding their own content without proper attribution. Wanting to filter the misinformation, I ordered the case file from the Washington National Records Center in Suitland, MD. I have also confirmed that Mr. Akwei is alive and well and as he acknowledges is not now nor has ever been employed by the NSA nor has he ever made any such claims. He also affirms that the images posted here are not his and that in other republications of his dossier the last paragraph has been changed. No other legal action has been taken by Mr. Akwei since the 1992 ruling.

In the interest of presenting the facts of this case I have uploaded the documents I received from the WNRC. Certain names have been redacted per Mr. Akwei's request to protect those who may have been falsely accused due to deception. The note in the case file saying "no page 4 per pltf." is due to a page numbering error by Mr. Akwei at the time of filing.

John Akwei v. NSA (Court Docket 92-CV-449)
John Akwei v. NSA (Case File 92-CV-449)
Covert Operations of the US National Security Agency (Nexus April-May 1996)
The Website of John Akwei